Does anyone follow M-W words of the day OR have a screensaver that displays words and definitions?
I do. I saw Parthenocarpy early this morning. What a word!
I have long believed that M-W has purposefully placed significant words to their daily postings. I remember during the elections and during not-so democratic actions by the former administration, times that M-W would define words with implicit meanings to current events.
Parthenocarpy? How does this relate? I browsed the headlines on AP News (Aug 9) and here is what I saw:
- “Obama presses for new tone in US ties with Mexico”,
- “1 million evacuated as powerful typhoon hits China”,
- “7 bodies pulled from Hudson after midair collision”,
- “Chavez urges military to be prepared for conflict”,
- “Immune system cancer found in young 9/11 officers”,
- “Iran judiciary looks to calm prison abuse outrage”,
- “‘The View’ star Hasselbeck has 3rd child, a boy”,
- “Damon, Teixeira power Yankees to 5-2 win over Sox”,
- “Tiger rallies to win at Firestone”and
- “SC gov’s plane use questioned”
Oh, btw, M-W defines Parthenocarpy as “the production of fruits without fertilization”. You probably already knew this if you clicked the above link.
A few of the headlines feel somewhat related, but one is worth reading. “Chavez urges military to be prepared for conflict”. I could see myself describing the situation in Venezuela with the word “parthenocarpy.” It might be a stretch, but I could use the word for describing stories #1, 6, 7 (no brainer) and 10.
M-W words that are promoted in screensavers or by email or rss, have a anti-”horoscope” type effect on me. By anti, I mean that horoscopes tell the future, M-W words make me think about the present.
I read the definition of “parthenocarpy”, read the headlines and made an association. It’s my association. I associated the definition with the Chavez headline.
Why do we hate Chavez sooooo much? Is Venezuela really a threat. My assertion is that Chavez has some similarity to Barry Bonds. They are both dickheads. We are disgusted by their actions, but for some reason, we accept them on the playing field. We, as Americans, righteously sing/chant our discontent when they appear in the headlines, or stepped up to bat, or made a press appearance, or whatever. We band together and trumpet BOOOOO!!!
The differences between Bonds and Chavez are, needless to mention, significant. One that i’ll focus on is what we know versus what we don’t. I’d bet that 94.3% of Chavez haters, don’t know about the situation. They Booo becuase their neighbors tell them to. Non-Booers are anti-America. On the other hand, 93.6% of Bonds haters know alot and are proud of their studiousness. They know baseball, they know steriods, they know a liar, and are justified.
What I know about Latin America, its politics and economies, and the history of Venezuela, assists me in not being too surprised with our national dislike of Chavez. He is a belligerent asshole, who without apology, disses the US whenever the opportunity arises. When Americans are dissed, they typically jump in a fight. The word “typically” is an important clarifier. In this context it means IF the “disser” is sitting on top of a boatload of Texas Tea, THEN we fight ELSE we call them a lunatic, a nutjob. North Korea’s boss is a crazy looking short, balding goof. No worries. Saddam, Achmedahdedachmenadeenajob, Chavez and the rest are NOT nutjobs purely due to their geological fortunes.
Ok. These guys are all nutty. But the ones we go after, the ones where we can justify military intervention towards, are the ones that have boatloads of oil.
At least 1/3 of Venezuela’s cash flow is derived from it’s bubbling crude.
Venezuela is a beautiful world. In my case, mythical. It is the country where my oldest brother was conceived. It is the country that my parents served in the Peace Corps during the late 60′s, it kept Dad out of Vietnam, and I am grateful. It is the country where my Father became a pinball wizard. A witch doctor healed my Mom there, from what I don’t know, but apparently it worked. Venezuela is a third world, struggling for survival. Venezuela is a beautiful, mythical world.
So what about Hugo? In my fantasy, he is a guy trying to wear Robin Hood’s tights, without looking gay; Rhetorically damning the overly fortunate and inspiring the downtrodden. What is wrong with this? We encourage “faith” and “hope” to everyone who is without means. The most purely religious folks I have me, are dirt-ass poor. They pray and pray and pray. They walk the talk. Unlike the the very well endowed religious folks that contort the bible to elicit hate and to justify bad behavior.
I am not religious btw. Or at least I don’t go to church. I am not a church hater though. I just like to sleep in. I believe in God, but I have very little expectations. I believe in evolution and science too.
Hugo is “producing fruits that aren’t ripened”. That’s cool. Isn’t that what we all do? For example, I want to get a motorcross dirt bike. Allison is doesn’t really support the idea. SO what do I do? I slowly, cautiously, ripen the fruit, By the time it’s ready for consumption, she is hungry. I get the bike, she is happy and filled. And when I crash and get head stitches, she is excitedly licensed to say, “I told you so”
I don’t think that Hugo Chavez is as evil as we percieve. He may look funny and say offensive stuff, but he’s not a threat. He is speaking to all Latin Americans who feel bungholed by North America. There is alot of stuff that the US has done to Latin America that would justify great discontent, hatred and anger. Hugo Chavez might be ripe (ripe could mean that he needs deodorant, or it may mean fresh, as in someone who talks smack).
I really like the word “parthenocarpic”. I also like the many meanings of ripe. I don’t like Barry Bonds and I am not an advocate of Hugo Chavez. It’s my opinion. That’s all. I am a ripening fruit.